Two questions that will be behind every conversation at the meeting.

  1. Why Science in Society? and
  2. Why Science, Technology and Sustainable Development?


Why Science in Society?

This is an extract from the EU "Science in Society" page.

Science is part of almost every aspect of our lives. Although we rarely think about it, science makes extraordinary things possible. At the flick of a switch, we have light and electricity. When we are ill, science helps us get better. It tells us about the past, helps us with the present, and creates ways to improve our future. Scientific endeavor is as much about us as it is for us. Its place in society, therefore, is not to unfold quietly at the sidelines but to become a fundamental part of the game. Now more than ever, science must engage with us, and we must engage with science.

There are times when science can seem to lose its connection to society and its needs, and sometimes its objectives are not fully understood, even if they are well intended. The lack of a common language and rapid progress in many areas of research has increased the public's concern or contributed to ambivalence about the role that science and technology play in everyday life. But science cannot work in isolation, and advances in science and technology are not an objective in their own right.


Build gateways with the public: Of course, while new developments can improve our quality of life and understanding of the world, scientists and policymakers may not always properly assess the potential risks or take full account of the public's concerns. Opportunities must be created for scientists and the general public to exchange views in a two-way dialogue of mutual respect and trust.

Inspire the next era of scientists: With the pace that the world keeps and the speed with which technology advances, an understanding of science is a crucial part of a rounded education. Moreover, Europe needs more scientists and more people skilled in science and technology in order to compete in the global arena. It is, however, becoming increasingly difficult to attract young people to science careers. There is also a clear gender imbalance in science, engineering and technology: while 59 % of graduates in EU universities are female, only 18 % of professors are women.

Integrate science into the mix: The European Union believes that activities in support of these important objectives need to be underpinned by sound knowledge, and has continued to commit resources under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) to make this happen.


The Science in Society (SIS) Programme addresses societal engagement from many perspectives, such as encouraging dialogue between scientists and other members of the public, by promoting an adherence to ethical standards, and by developing better ways for the results of research to be accessed by all. The SIS Programme also supports new ways to interest young people in science and in research careers, and new ways to achieve greater gender equality in science.

The SIS Programme has also been charged with the responsibility of supporting the following specific research activities: the connection between science, democracy and law; ethics in science and technology; the reciprocal influence of science and culture; the role and image of scientists; gender aspects; science education methods; and science communication.




Why Science, Technology and Sustainable Development

The following document from the Earth Summit 2002 illustrates the link between S&T (Science&Technology) and Sustainable Development:

Science and Technology as a Foundation for Sustainable Development

Why is science and technology essential for sustainable development?

Sustainable development is probably the most daunting challenge that humanity has ever faced, and achieving it requires that the fundamental issues be addressed immediately at local, regional and global levels. At all scales, the role of science and technology is crucial; scientific knowledge and appropriate technologies are central to resolving the economic, social and environmental problems that make current development paths unsustainable. Bridging the development gap between the North and the South, and alleviating poverty to provide a more equitable and sustainable future for all, requires novel integrated approaches that fully incorporate existing and new scientific knowledge. The Scientific and Technological (S&T) community can make a leading contribution to tackling major problems identified in Sections III and V of the Millennium Declaration - "Freedom from want" and "Sustaining our future". These issues include: i) fighting against disease; ii) population growth and urbanization; iii) the digital/information divide; iv) coping with climate change; v) confronting the water crisis; vi) defending the soil; vii) preserving forests, fisheries and biodiversity and viii) building a new ethic of global stewardship. Whatever the cultural, geographical, socio-economic and environmental setting, a strong partnership between the S&T community and other members of civil society, the private sector and governments is a fundamental prerequisite for sustainable development.


How can the various S&T communities improve their contributions to sustainable development?

Implementing Agenda 21 during the next decade and beyond will build on progress made during the past ten years in generating knowledge targeted to sustainable development objectives and in developing cleaner and more affordable technologies. However, enhancing the S&T community's capacity to contribute to sustainable development will require significant changes. The S&T community is committed to implementing necessary changes and developing appropriate partnerships. These changes include:

-More policy relevant science: A much greater share of research must integrate problem-oriented and interdisciplinary research that addresses the social, economic, and environmental pillars of sustainable development. Good science is essential for good governance.

-Broad-based, participatory approaches: Traditional divides between the natural, social, economic, and engineering sciences and other major stakeholders must be bridged. Research agendas must be defined through broad-based, participatory approaches involving those in need of scientific information. The S&T community accepts its responsibility to improve cooperation with other parts of civil society, the private sector, governments, and intergovernmental bodies.

-Promoting gender equality in science: Historically women have been severely under-represented in science. The S&T community will actively promote gender equality in science and work with Women and organisations (e.g., Third World Organization for Women in Science) to eliminate existing barriers.

New contract between science & technology and society for sustainable development

The basic changes outlined above are essential for redirecting the present global s&t system towards the sustainable development challenge. however, it is now clearer than ever that this challenge has thus far outstripped the capacities both of the s&t community and of society to forge effective and comprehensive responses. nothing less than a new contract between the s&t community and society is required.

The following are crucial components of such a new contract:

1. Improving education and capacity building.Enhanced science teaching at both the primary and secondary levels is central to scientific and technological capacity building and to a better public understanding of sustainable development issues. A further target should be to increase the percentage of university level students enrolled in science, mathematics and engineering. Current enrollments are decreasing in most developed and developing countries alike. Three core components are critical in enhancing capacity: skilled individuals, efficient institutions and active networks. Capacity building at the international, regional and sub-regional levels must be given increased attention, as it is often the most cost efficient way to build a critical mass of S&T capacity.

2. Bridging the North-South divide in scientific and technological capacity.While it is necessary to build and enhance strong scientific and technological capacity in all regions of the world, this need is particularly pressing in developing countries. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries spend annually more on research and development (R&D) than the economic output of the world's 61 least developed countries. Developed countries employ twelve times the per capita number of scientists and engineers in R&D than developing countries, where there is woefully weak institutional S&T capacity. Ten years after Rio, this challenge remains a major obstacle to sustainable development. Developing countries must address this problem and enhance significantly investment in higher education and S&T capacity. The developed countries must accept their responsibility for much improved knowledge and technology sharing. Bilateral donors and other funding mechanisms should substantially increase the funds they allocate to S&T for sustainable development, especially in the area of scientific and technological capacity building.

3. Clean technologies and sustainable production and consumption patterns. The public and private funding of science and technology, in developed and developing countries alike, must focus on developing new clean technologies, and supporting sustainable production systems and consumption patterns. There should also be improved international sharing and local adaptation of clean and/or traditional technologies. In many instances traditional technologies offer viable solutions. Due emphasis should be placed, whenever appropriate on local, culturally adapted and low-cost technologies.

4. overnance for sustainable development Governance systems for sustainable development at local, national, regional and global levels must incorporate the best available scientific and technological knowledge. The link between the S&T community and decision-making is poorly supported by current institutional structures. Existing governance institutions and institutional mechanisms need to be transformed in ways which ensure S&T input; if necessary, new mechanisms should be developed to meet this explicit goal. The tool of integrated scientific and technological assessments needs to be bolstered and enhanced at national, regional and global levels. It is proposed that a formal link be established between the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) and the organising partners of the Dialogue Segment for the S&T community (ICSU and WFEO), for example through an S&T Advisory Panel. This would be a mechanism to ensure that the CSD can draw upon independent scientific and technological expertise and advice.

5. Long-term perspectives and data needs The S&T community has a responsibility to provide the knowledge and technologies that will enable a long-term sustainable future. To this end, a basic requisite will be to establish long-term monitoring systems for collecting reliable scientific, socio-economic and other societal data. These systems must permit the integration of all relevant data sets for addressing crucial sustainability issues. The global environmental observation systems need to be made fully operational, which requires governmental funding. Full and open access to scientific information data must be ensured.

6. Augmenting financial resources for S&T for sustainable development Current levels of investment in S&T for sustainable development are far too low in both developed and developing countries. This is true both with respect to the scope of the problems and with respect to the promising rate of return on S&T investments. Larger investments in S&T should be seen primarily as increased investment in a country's socio-economic development and in preserving natural life-support systems for the present and future generations, rather than simply as research expenditures. For this reason, public sector funding for S&T activities targeted on sustainable development goals should be augmented significantly in both the North and the South. The private sector should reorient its S&T investments in a manner, which integrates sustainable development objectives and should increase its S&T investments generally. Strategic partnerships should be forged between the public and private S&T sectors at national and regional levels.


Specific new partnership initiatives

The S&T community has taken the initiative to launch several new partnership initiatives geared towards implementing important recommendations in a number of agenda 21 chapters. the participation of other partners is sought in these initiatives as appropriate.

  • science and technology for sustainable development: The current global change programmes3 provide an important platform for the development of scientific endeavours addressing key issues related to sustainable development. Within the next few years, initiatives will be launched that address all three pillars of sustainable development in a more integrated way. The aim is to develop such interdisciplinary science programmes addressing key sustainable development issues in a participatory fashion, engaging other dialogue partners as well as the engineering community.
  • International S&T Capacity Building;
  • The Role of Food Security in Sustainable Development: Food security is an essential component of sustainable development, especially for developing countries. ICSU will launch a Global Environmental Change and Food Systems (GECaFS) Programme. Possible partners include IAP, FAO, as well as the Farmers and Women Major Groups.
  • Health as an integral component of sustainable development: Major research initiatives are already underway to address the scourge of infectious diseases that is the major cause of morbidity and premature mortality in developing countries. The S&T community is fully committed to these initiatives. Further to this, the S&T Community is committed to the integrating human health research with all three pillars of sustainable development. For example, ICSU's global change programmes are initiating a partnership with WHO and IAMP focused on environment and health.
  • Blending traditional and scientific knowledge for sustainable development: ICSU and UNESCO, in collaboration with the Indigenous People and Business & Industry Major Groups, will develop a new initiative for the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources based on traditional knowledge. TWAS activities on indigenous medicinal and food plants could provide additional links to S&T community in developing countries. Planning of activities and targets to be achieved will initially be for five years.
  • Demonstrating Applications of the Global Environmental Observing Systems: ICSU, its relevant interdisciplinary programmes, UNESCO, and the other UN-system agencies are co-sponsoring the Global Observing System. The focus should now be on making this system operational and the applications of the Global Environmental Observing Systems for enhancing integrated approaches to sustainable natural resource management.





Login Here

Or use Facebook:
Connect with Facebook

Who's Online

We have 8 guests online


Visitors Counter

Visits today:95
Visits total:524483
Impressions total:1422887
Sponsors Youth in Action Ινστιτουτο Νεολαιας Γενικη Γραμματεια Νεας Γενιας Positive Energy
© 2016 The content of this website remains under the unique responsibility of DAY AFTER. The European Commission is not responsible for any use of the published information. ENSAA - Young Europeans Discuss Sustainable Development. All Rights Reserved.
Website concept and content by Dr Ino Agrafioti
Site created by T. Kalligeris